Scientific discipline won't buy it. Neither would Freud. Just because some girl or some guy makes you feel funny, only means that they're a funny person, or you have bad digestion that might root from any of the incomplete stages of Erikson's stages of psychosocial development, not a proof to your orientation.
Let's take the example of how cyclopropenylidene only reacts with electrophilic olefins. This wasn't assumed, it was rigorously tested. In fact, cyclopropenylidene was abused, treated, and observed in the company of several other compounds... Imagine a bunch of scientists waking up every morning with a naughty grin on their face about what they would test cyclopropenylidene with today.
The human body being a compound of other compounds ourselves, we can also reduce ourselves to chemical reactions in a way.
Here's a test for any hardcore heteros: have "it" with a girl, then with five guys (vice versa for the gals). All reins loose, anything-goes sex. By the assumption of their purebred hetero-ness, they should remain unaffected by any pleasures of a similar flesh. Much like Sachin remains unaffected by the Zimbabwe bowling attack, and makes it look neither like any sort of bowling or any sort of attack. Moreover, their hetero-ism must be strong and sure enough to resist all homo-ism, and the experience must be a mute one. Much like how the inertness of noble gases was tested with other elements.
Widget by Css Reflex | TutZone
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment