Showing posts with label trees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trees. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

dreaming bromides, sehjal olifera

Woke up in a fix. Had dreams I couldn't understand. Wishing that I were still with Mwg who would spend hours interpreting my dreams, at the expense, of both our office times and the world economy (since our employers were international cos); she enjoyed picking on my subconscious hurt. Back then, however, I had a rather simplistic theme of snakes ongoing. Like a short movie, they were mostly about one person (me or somebody) going through a trippy moment or a transforming experience. Now they have bloated to being about one person, and another person, and with a lot of other persons around. Highlight of the dream was embrace moments with ex, and a record throw of breaking a Seven Tiles tile-pile from a throw from hundreds of yards and over the treetops - like a Remi Gaillard video.

So it happens that a coupla weeks after running into a gentleman who was running a Sehjan / Sejal / Sejan (Moringa Oleifera) plantation somewhere in Ghaziabad (suburbs of Delhi), I come across a convincing train of data and YT videos on the efficacy of the tree. It's serves a broad range of proteins / amino acids, and Vit C, Calcium, Vit A, Protien, Potassium, times multiple of that contained in other food sources. I shall get in touch promptly plan to dope myself with some unusual bio-hacks (is that what Ayurveda is, or claims to be, all about unprocessed natural concoctions?).

Wednesday, August 05, 2015

merosity verbosity


Stepping out at J, I notice the sickle stick at action, lopping off overhanging tree branches at the junction, keeping Delhi's favorite hangout of CP prim and away from any liability claims. Things are done pretty old school - sickles are put into similar use even in Indian villages.

I'm late yet again. Then I find my friend's gonna be late-r. My tendencies bring me to examine the trash, that is the cluster of freshly-pruned branches. My interests has gone into plant structures of late - merosity, whorls, and phylotaxy were found interesting, concepts that are easier and more interesting for someone of a mathematical bend, and no biological background. So there I was, outside SB, down on the pavement, examining branches.

those nodules were enticing
Small things get people talking. A middle-aged gentleman in red tee came up to me, and expressed curiosity in what I was upto. (I'd noticed him step out of his Indica with a curious eye). Since such reasons are incoherent and messy to explain, I faked by telling him it was for my coursework (generation algorithms must learn from plants, so biology is still a connected domain that could enter my discipline anyday). I did give him sane reasons for doing whatever I was, though. He seemed more moved than before. He gave a long introduction of how he had been very pro- person about plants, and nature in general. How he had moved to Ghaziabad, from a home in Moti Nagar that nobody wanted to give away, to nurse his ailing mother. I complimented him - genuinely - that his age seemed to fool people for the same reasons; and he, a 56-year-old, liked hearing that so much that he asked again, and I elaborated that he even betrayed a father's looks.

Then I got to hear about his son, something about my age, and into all random crap of the world, on professional terms! We had a lot in common - being Delhi-educated folks, IPU-worn folks (his was BVP), that had a lot of 'alternate' going. His son had stepped into politics, in a way, through dance, and organized flashdance-mobs for the now-ruling Aam Aadmi Party during their election campaign. 
He (son) was also a part of Greenpeace, which I have coincidentally been thinking of (a bit obsessively) in the past 3 days. Again felt it was a small world, indeed, a one where I am around, but maybe not tapped in.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Distinguishing between Pines, Fir and Spruce

What is the difference between pine, fir, spruce? Here's a condensed way to see it (in theory). Try to register and link things at some pace.

At the beginning of time
Everything with pointy, evergreen leaves was labeled "Fir".
Prussia (that historical region in Central Europe that now stands divided) was famous for its fir. It was called "Prussian Fir".
"Pruce" became a contemporary term for Prussia. "Spruce" came as an alternative form of Pruce.
"Prussian Fir" now came to be referred to "Spruce Fir", or "Spruce" in short. Just a kind of fir from Northern Europe.

Alongside
"Pinus" was a Latin term for the fir trees of their region.
The English who got a hard-on from Latin adopted Pinus (as "Pine"). So now there was a distinction between fir (rugged, northern kind) and pines (thin, but more solid kind).

And then...
Then came scientific classification, and everything was taken under the "Conifer" umbrella. It included cypress, firs, pines, spruces among others. Basically anything with needle-like leaves and a resinous wood.
Scientific classification further included conifers, alongwith larches, hemlocks, cedars under the "Pinaceae" umbrella.

Currently
Now, the original pines are the genus 'pinus' species in the Pinaceae family. Clustered needles that have a sort of cuticle or “sheath” at the base.
The firs, which initially included everything, now came under the genus 'Abies'. Needles are flat, do not come in bunches and grow straight out of the branch without a stem.
Spruce came under genus 'Picea'. They were differentiated from the regular firs (Abies), in that their needles have a rectangular cross-section.

So...
Pinaceae >> Conifer > Pines (Pinus) && Firs (Abies) && Spruce (Picea)

Yesss, brain dead!